Guest poster Brent Harris steps inside the gates of Jurassic World to bring a non-spoiler review.
Jurassic World
really wanted to be Jurassic Park for a new breed of teenager
that is already accustomed to seeing CGI-laden movies straight out of
their embryos. Fourteen years later, Colin Trevorrow delivers on that
CGI spectacle. But there is an ominous undercurrent of proper
criticism here, as one character aptly says, just as all dino-hell is
about to once again break loose, “They never learn.”
Much of the movie’s chaos is
comfortably held behind goliath gates for the first two acts of the
film while it takes its time to wonderfully develop its tone and
themes. There are quite a few touching homages to the original
Jurassic Park, and where World is fully aware of itself
and pays respects to Park, the movie is truly at its best. The third act was clearly written by an eight-year-old playing with a bucket of plastic
dinosaurs.
Jurassic World continues the
theme of control which Jurassic Park author Michael Crichton
so deftly crafted in his original tale. Are we ever really in
control? Or, as this movie asks, are we the ones just used to being
the monsters?
Here, the committee of story-tellers give us the
uptight control freak, Claire Dearing, played by Bryce Dallas Howard,
as the Hammond-clone who has successfully managed Jurassic World for
an unspecified number of years since the incidences which shut-down
the first Jurassic Park.
And, since the park operates so
smoothly and attendance has plateaued, it’s time for something with
more teeth. “A child looks at a stegosaurus the same way they look
at a rhinoceros in a zoo,” Dearing explains. We have to build
something bigger. And here’s where the film oddly parodies its own
past success. You can almost hear Trevorrow say directly to the
audience, “We have to outdo the last CGI movie. We have to get the
audience’s attention.”
That’s when this amusing ride breaks
down. The film takes a tour of themes involving sexism, rights of
cloned animals, the possibilities and dangers of genetic
modifications and then makes a bizarre detour toward a burdensome
plotline involving the sinister use of dinosaurs for military
purposes. “Makes you wonder what else Ingen was up to,” Grant
pontificates in the third film of the series. These themes are
certainly fine to explore, but the film only ever scratches at the
surface without sinking its teeth into any one of them, only to
abandon all pretext of any story by the time dinos rampage across the
screen in the final act. Jurassic World strives to do too
much, without ever doing any one thing well.
For Spectacle, I give it: 5 out of 5
Fleeing Humans
For Story, I give it: 3 Ian Malcoms out
of 5.
Brent Harris is a dinosaur
enthusiast, a writer and is known to lie around like a shirtless,
injured, Ian Malcolm. One of his first short stories, a Fanfic of
Jurassic Park, involved a heavy portion of the plot to Jurassic
World, written twenty years ago. He wonders
when his royalty check will be posted.
When you get that royalty check, pass it around. Great review. Does not make me want to see the movie though.
ReplyDeleteAs a big fan of Jurassic Park (the novel, not so much the films), I always go to these screen portrayals with a mix of deja vu amusement (as my nightmares are filled with dinosaurs chasing me in Disneworld) and wonder on how much of the actual scientific ethic debate (which was part of the book plot) will be skipped in favour of the next stunning cgi sequence. That said, I settle for the unbridled fun that is watching people running away from dinosaurs that put Lassie to shame because some mad scientist thought they would be great pets. Also, a pack of raptors running alongside Starlord in a dirt bike? It is the closest thing we will get to a Dinoriders show. Now I demand that for the sequel they add lasers and telepathic headbands. C'mon Ingen, you can always aim higher and fail epicly as expected, you are the Homer Simpson of evil corporations.
ReplyDelete